skip to content

Keynes Fund

 

Summary of Project Plan


Does inequality matter for business cycles, and through which channels? The dispersion in earnings and incomes evidently varies over the cycle—but do these fluctuations in inequality simply reflect the underlying business cycle dynamics, or is the cyclicality of inequality itself a mechanism that shapes how the US economy experiences expansions and recessions?

To answer these questions, we estimate a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model with heterogeneous households, which includes all the ingredients that the literature has shown to be necessary to fit the aggregate data and augment it with a stylized description of household heterogeneity encompassing heterogeneity in marginal propensities to consume MPCs; arbitrarily correlated (endogenous) income processes (and thus income inequality); and income risk, which triggers self-insurance, precautionary savings motives.

We estimate the model using (i) the same aggregate data customarily used in the DSGE literature, as well as (ii) information on the cyclical evolution of the cross-sectional standard deviation of labor income and post-tax income from the Current Population Survey and (iii) a priori information based on microeconomic studies on aspects of the model that affect the interaction between its cross-sectional and time-series behavior (MPCs and higher moments of the income distribution).

We use the estimated model to quantify the role of several aspects of inequality in the amplification and propagation of business cycles. We do so through counterfactual simulations that eliminate features of the model with heterogeneity that the literature has identified as potentially relevant for the transmission of shocks. In a “no-inequality” benchmark, for example, business cycle fluctuations are less pronounced than in the data: the standard deviation of GDP growth is 27 percent lower, while that of de-trended hours worked 36 percent lower. We show that most of the reduction in volatility in the more equal economy is due to the elimination of the steady-state level of inequality, rather than its cyclicality.

Our preliminary results suggest that the striking cyclical pattern of inequality is a reflection, more than a driver, of the observed features of aggregate business cycles. While the cyclical variation of inequality appears of secondary importance for the transmission of aggregate fluctuations, its long-run level is key. According to our model, inequality shapes business cycles mostly through the effect of risk on the behavior of savers; this risk is quantitatively mostly driven by the decline in consumption associated with falling to the bottom of the income distribution. We thus plan to investigate the role of unemployment risk and extensive margins as an underlying factor driving precautionary saving over the cycle.

 

Project Output


Inequality and Business Cycles. Bilbiie, F., Primiceri, G. E., Tambalotti, A., (2022), Janeway Institute Working Paper

Abstract: We quantify the connection between inequality and business cycles in a medium-scale New Keynesian model with tractable household heterogeneity, estimated with aggregate and cross-sectional data. We find that inequality substantially amplifies cyclical fluctuations. The primary source of this amplification is cyclical precautionary saving behavior. Savers reduce their consumption to insure themselves against the idiosyncratic risk of large income drops, which rises in recessions.

Publisher link: https://www.janeway.econ.cam.ac.uk/publication/jiwp2234

 

Greed? Profits, Inflation, and Aggregate Demand. Bilbiie, F. O., Kanzig, D. R., (2023), Janeway Institute Working Paper

Abstract: Amidst the recent resurgence of inflation, this paper investigates the interplay of corporate profits and income distribution in shaping inflation and aggregate demand within the New Keynesian framework. We derive a novel analytical condition for profits to be procyclical and inflationary. Furthermore, we show that the cyclicality of profits is a key determinant of the propagation properties of these models under household heterogeneity, but there is a catch: for aggregate-demand fluctuations and inflation to be amplified by heterogeneity, profits have to be countercyclical—an implication that is at odds with the data. Adding physical capital investment to the model can resolve this conundrum, generating aggregate-demand amplification even under procyclical profits. However, the amplification works through an investment channel and not through profits, inconsistent with the narrative attributing elevated inflation to corporate greed.

Publisher link: https://www.janeway.econ.cam.ac.uk/publication/jiwp2313

 

 

Professor Florin Bilbiie

 

Florin Bilbiie is Professor of Economics at University of Lausanne, Switzerland) & University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. His research focuses on business cycles and the role, effects and optimal design of monetary and fiscal policies, in environments with: heterogeneous households (limited participation and incomplete markets); firm entry/product creation and market power; and/or complementarities.

 

Professor Giorgio Primiceri

 

Giorgio Primiceri is Professor at the Department of Economics, Northwestern University. His research interests are in macroeconomics and applied time-series econometrics.

 

Andrea Tambalotti

 

Andrea Tambalotti is an economic research advisor in Macroeconomic and Monetary Studies within the Monetary Policy Research Division. His recent work explores the connection between consumer expectations and macroeconomic outcomes using data from the NY Fed’s Survey of Consumer Expectations, as well as the causes and implications of low interest rates in the global economy.

 

Cambridge Working Papers in Economics (CWPE)


 
 

 

Share this Project